Thursday, 29 March 2012

Media Use Diary


Over the past ten days, I have systematically typed out every minute of my personal media usage. This meant that each time I went on the internet, read my book, made a phone call or bloody well sneezed I wrote it down. The whole process was time consuming and inconvenient. It wasn’t until I started graphing the results that I saw the benefits of media logging.

Uni assignments aside, it is the best way to see how I interact with and use all the types of media at my disposal. As a journalism student, I have to be aware of how the world uses different technologies to suit its needs. How am I to do this without knowing the ways, and the reasons I use media in my own life? The following analysis of my results will look at the types of media I used, and  why I used them in that way. 

The table below is my ten day media log, the data provided was the basis for all of my personal graphs. Each category was classified into the different forms of media in use, and totals calculated at the end.


FORMS:

With over twenty different subcategories in use, I organised my data into five media groups: Radio, Computer, Smart Phone, Television and Text Media. The graph of this can be seen below labelled ‘Media Usage”. Each of these forms of media is integral to journalism and communication. This tells us that news has found a niche in all the forms of media we are exposed to. Journalism and communication obviously play a vital role in modern life.

Forms of Media


Originally, I thought the graph would show me which forms of media I favoured. I was wrong; radio aside the time spent on each was similar. I attributed this to the fact that each media group is used for very different purposes, all of which I value. These purposes are summarised below:

Computer – University study
Smart Phone – Social networking and News
Television – Entertainment
Text Media – Novel
Radio – Music

To prove this I made another graph where I presented my media uses, rather than the forms. Seen below, these corresponding graphs show beyond doubt that I am a very media specific person. 

Media Purposes vs. Media Forms




FUNCTIONS

In relation to journalism this means that each form of media has a specific role my life, and more specifically that my Smartphone is the only way I am subjected to the practice of journalism. If the large majority of people showed the same statistics, it would be a huge concern for those in print or radio journalism. Evidently, subscriber numbers have dropped in both of those fields since online news.

The reason for this, as I see it, is because online news is so convenient. Not only is it available twenty-four hours a day, but it is updated constantly. The graph below shows my news sources:

Ways I access the News

Apart from one lonely little Sunrise session before uni, all of my news, a huge 88%, came from my Smartphone. For me it is the easiest, most thorough and cheapest way to access news. I have outlined below some of the positive functions of on-line news (particularly with Smart Phones):

·         I can read the news whenever I want, not just when a program starts
·         Stories are updated twenty-four hours a day
·         Hundreds of news sites are available, all in the palm of my hand
·         I don’t have to go to a newsagents, a radio or a television to read the news
·         I can save stories that I like at the touch of a button
·         People are able to contribute easily and openly on most stories by commenting


The reason so many people are using on-line news is because it has more functions than radio and print media have to offer. This affects journalism and communication because people in today’s society want functionality. They want to do more with less effort, an ‘all in one’ lifestyle. Smart Phones are helping people worldwide achieve that goal. This link shows a list of all the things an Iphone (my model) can do. I had no idea I have so much at my fingertips. 


Ways I use my Smartphone


Far less impressive than the list on the website, the above graph shows how I used my Smartphone over the ten day period. It’s amazing that only 14% of my time on the phone was actually spent making calls and texting. This shows that my Iphone is much more to me than a means of communication. All of my social networking, banking, gaming, e-mailing and most of my news are done on my Smartphone. Without it I wouldn't get e-mails until I came home, exchanging money would be a nightmare, and I probably wouldn't play games at all. 

This form of media has completely changed the way I operate, along with many others. In JOUR1111, 77.3% of people own an internet enabled Smartphone; this can be seen in the table below. 



Class Results on Smartphone


To see how this has affected journalism directly we can look at another section of the survey which shows the ways the class accessed news (see graph below). It can be seen that online news is the second most popular form, with 67.8%. The class’s data does not match my own, as television and newspapers rank highly. Then again, when I completed the survey I selected newspapers and television, which it turns out I barely use at all. 

Class Results on Ways to Access News


In conclusion, completing this assignment has made me realise how limited I am in my media use. This doesn't bother me. I use each form of media in the way that serves me best and is most convenient. I think this is how everybody approaches journalism. I have grown up in a technological world, where every day things are being made easier for us. I believe Smartphones and the internet will become increasingly important to the practice of journalism and communication in the future. 




Wednesday, 21 March 2012

Wk 3: What is Text?



Listening to Skye Doherty’s lecture this week, I learnt a lot about the benefits and uses of text in relation to journalism. Both online and on paper, the written word is vital, and mastery of it is increasingly important. I also learnt that text makes up almost every part of a news story, each part having its own style and purpose. These included the headline, photo captions and break out boxes. Reflecting on this, I could see that text is not just important to journalism, but almost every part of our lives.

In western society, text is everywhere. It helps us follow directions, derive meaning, identify objects and keep in contact with people. Since its simple beginnings tens of thousands of years ago, the written word has become increasingly important to human life. From hieroglyphs to neon lights we really have come a long way (see images below). Now it is almost impossible to go through a day without reading something; perhaps this is why those in news and advertising have to be such talented wordsmiths. This applies especially to those involved in online news.

Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs (left) and Times Square New York (right) show how text has changed over the milenia

Text used in online news has different purposes again. I leant in this lecture that headlines in a newspaper may differ completely from those used on the internet. This has to do with search engines, as text on the internet is “searchable”. Because of this, online headlines must include a lot more key words than those in newspapers. 

This feature of online journalism has a lot to do with metadata. Metadata is used to facilitate and improve the retrieval of information (Dr.W Cathro - Metadata: An Overview). Usually when we search for a specific item on the internet, we are presented with tens of thousands of results. Metadata, tags and links are being improved every day to make it easier to find what you want online. 

I find it pretty interesting that text, the most important part of newspapers and online news sites, is used so differently in each media. Perhaps this is the beginning of their separation. Text is never going to disappear from our lives, but the way we use it is rapidly changing. Print and online news are making those changes now so that eventually, both can operate side by side successfully.  

Saturday, 17 March 2012

Wk 2: New News


Week two’s lecture on web iterations showed me that the Internet and all of its uses have become absolutely ingrained in today’s modern society. Just looking at myself I can see this. My whole social life is organised through Facebook, I find out everything from train times to trivia through Google, and university would be absolutely impossible without the Internet (I actually watched this lecture online). So as it is, Web 1.0 and 2.0 have changed the way we access information and connect with one and other. Web 3.0 looks like it may end up doing all of this for us. 

Some aspects of the Semantic Web really impressed me, geo-tagging in particular.  I was at a festival a few weeks ago and lost four of my friends early on, the phone reception was horrible so I didn’t find them until later that night. Learning about Web 3.0 made me think of an app I heard about a while ago, seen in the YouTube clip below.
















Something like this would have made our day a lot easier. Apple is really starting to break into the Semantic Web with apps such as these and Siri. I know I would have trouble getting by without my Iphone, but I don’t know if that’s a good thing.

The idea of Web 3.0 amazed me, but it also makes me a little nervous. I don’t think we should depend on technology any more than we do already, or have such an individual Internet. Sure it might make things easier for us, but at what cost? Web 1.0 and 2.0 work so well online because the companies and social groups who utilise them are there to display themselves to the masses. 

Social networks are accessible profiles of your life (albeit only the parts you want to put out there), and neither 1.0 or 2.0 are built around privacy. Web 3.0 doesn’t become private just because it’s aimed at individuals. In fact the Internet now knows the semantics, the meaning behind everything you do. It tells your parents where you are 24 hours a day, knows what you type into Google at home, how much money you have in your bank account and which friends you talk to the most on Facebook. Everything we do online will have a meaning attached to it, and our Smartphones, or Laptops can remember that information and use it.

If advertisers can use this information to change the type of information we see online, who’s to say The Government, The Police or unknown individuals can’t as well? In the end I think it comes down to what we value more: confidentiality or convenience.